We have changed our privacy policy. In addition, we use cookies on our website for various purposes. By continuing on our website, you consent to our use of cookies. You can learn about our practices by reading our privacy policy.

ShmoopTube

Where Monty Python meets your 10th grade teacher.

Search Thousands of Shmoop Videos

Accounting: Ways to be Skeezy 16 Views


Share It!


Description:

The History of Accounting. Seriously. This is a Thing. As business grew more complex, it needed incrementally more complex systems to track the beans they were counting. And then came Quickbooks and the world was put into order.

Language:
English Language

Transcript

00:00

Accounting Allah shmoop ways to be Ski Z So if

00:06

honest cold neutral UN emotional financial reporting is thie accountants

00:11

flavor of the force then what are some ways in

00:13

which the force gets cheated at least in the short

00:16

run All right well let's consider an example here in

00:19

the realm of depreciation your thinking of investing in a

00:22

drone making company Blade Runner Nano Drone Ticker Brnd It

00:27

has to build a new twenty million dollars factory every

00:29

four years to upgrade its processes and stay calm petted

00:32

with its arch rival the drones own If the company

00:36

produced eight million dollars in cash profits in a given

00:38

year but ignored the fact that they have to replace

00:41

the factory every four years for a cool twenty million

00:44

bucks there well then it would look like the company

00:46

made eight million dollars that year Ski's alert Well yes

00:49

you could in fact just talk about the fact that

00:51

the company in the last twelve months produced eight million

00:54

bucks in cash That would be a true statement But

00:57

if it hits the wall every four years by not

01:00

spending to build a new whiz bang factory it's sales

01:03

then plummet and well then it's out of business three

01:05

years later so it has to spend that money for

01:08

upgrading the factory The statement of eight million dollars in

01:11

cash profits is true but misleading Welcome to the teachings

01:15

of the force of gap accounting Bye gap standards That

01:19

company should account for the fact that the twenty million

01:21

dollar factory is depreciating in value each year That is

01:26

it's getting worth less and less every year If they're

01:29

accountants applied straight line depreciation to that twenty million dollars

01:33

in cost every four years Then they would take out

01:36

five million a year from that eight million dollars of

01:39

cash profit to account for the fact that twenty million

01:42

dollars worth of that profit will be used up in

01:44

building a new factory So what's the right number for

01:47

Gap profit here A least notional profit Well yeah it's

01:51

just three million dollars not nearly as profitable a company

01:54

as that eight million dollars of cash generated might have

01:58

made it seem to be at first And this is

02:00

a re a really big deal in a world where

02:01

companies are valued usually as a multiple of their profits

02:06

not revenues not arm leavings by the CEO not units

02:09

sold Not well pretty much anything else over time anyway

02:12

Profits or earnings Riel earnings Not just one year's onetime

02:17

cash production earnings are the primary driver for the method

02:20

in which companies are valued when bought sold and or

02:23

traded publically on Wall or Bond Street If it going

02:26

multiple at which a stock trades is something like it

02:29

twenty times their earnings or their profits well fudging profits

02:33

can be a huge delta in the value or valuation

02:36

of the company That is twenty times the eight million

02:39

dollar figure here gives you a huge number one hundred

02:41

sixty million dollars that you think you might value that

02:45

drone company at while twenty times the three million gives

02:48

you well a whole lot less one hundred million dollars

02:50

less to be exact One tiny fact or gaff element

02:53

omitted and glam o one hundred million dollars hit to

02:57

the value of your company Will gap is the force

03:00

It's the rules the law the Constitution It's the structure

03:04

behind which every bean is counted and then fairly represented

03:09

to investors to the company To the world The beauty

03:12

of gap is that it sets all of those beans

03:15

on a level playing field you know so they don't

03:17

roll off the table What with Gap Everyone follows the

03:20

same rules Sono cos numbers get you know uniquely wonky

03:25

So this first example was about fairly allocating known costs

03:29

for known events like the upgrading of a factory to

03:32

produce drones But having already know numbers is a luxury

03:35

in a lot of cases What happens when you have

03:38

no idea what the newer new newest factory will then

03:41

cost when you're ready to build it Or that it

03:43

needs to be a nuclear powered or that it has

03:46

to buy a land permit somewhere and it has no

03:49

idea what that permit will cost Well when you don't

03:52

really know what something will cost you'll want to reserve

03:55

expenses for it in some form You go out and

03:58

get blind folds from your fifty shades party gay game

04:01

pack have your partner's spin you around three times and

04:03

then you throw a dart and ooh that's gotta hurt

04:06

Yeah you throw the dart and you just guess Well

04:08

the idea simply being that you give yourself some reasonable

04:12

wiggle room there which when you're trying to avoid dart

04:14

is really important Picture this scenario The company you love

04:18

so dearly just got sued for testing They're dissolving agent

04:21

on puppies The company is only worth three hundred million

04:24

dollars yet it's being sued for a billion That is

04:27

the lawyers on the other side want the company to

04:29

hand over the keys to the castle in its entirety

04:32

and fully go away in order to pay for the

04:35

damage done Well What's the right number two reserve as

04:38

an expense in this situation Well in other words what

04:41

costs can you anticipate having to pay in the future

04:45

rather than just accounting for what you have to pay

04:47

right now in the weekly retainer lawyer bills Well if

04:50

company reserved a billion dollars and they calculated that it

04:53

would take a decade to pay it all off well

04:55

they could then take one hundred million dollars a year

04:57

deduction in their profits at least notionally such that the

05:00

expected one hundred million dollars a year of profits would

05:03

become zero And voila The company would have no taxable

05:07

profits at least not for very long In fact more

05:10

likely a team of lawyers would give an educated guess

05:12

as to the real amount of the damages which might

05:15

be a lot closer to three million dollars than a

05:17

billion To be conservative the company might reserve unexpected loss

05:21

of ten million or even twenty million payable over a

05:23

few years which would reflect how most lawsuits like this

05:27

gets settled in real life So the basic idea is

05:29

that Gap Accounting requires the company to be conservative but

05:32

not ridiculously so Like Goldie Locks gaps Dr Tio not

05:36

be too hot not too cold but you know get

05:39

the porridge They're just right Okay Another Gap Force element

05:43

beyond fair representation of profits and proper methods of reserving

05:48

is about matching And it has nothing to do with

05:50

a dating site angst and or bitter loneliness Matching in

05:54

fact is the practice of cordoning off revenues with relevant

05:57

expenses or assigning related elements in a business with each

06:01

other So that if you had a global whoopee cushion

06:04

distributor but the warlords in Somalia decide one year that

06:07

those would now come their weapon of choice Well when

06:10

the Somalian division had huge revenues those revenues would be

06:14

held inside of Lionel say the African Division and not

06:17

attributed to the sales of whoopee cushions in Switzerland where

06:21

they're really not into no thinking would be specifically The

06:24

goal of matching is to try and present the best

06:26

clearest reflection of how the business is honestly doing without

06:30

trying to make it look better or worse than it

06:32

actually is So one core element of Gap accounting is

06:36

toe match revenues and expenses such that they both will

06:39

have occurred in the time period in which they occur

06:44

Your computer printer manufacturing company orders ten thousand plastic form

06:47

factor housings toe hold the ink paper roller input output

06:51

devices etcetera You sell only eight thousand units during the

06:54

quarter in which you were obligated to pay for those

06:57

form factors Right See about ten thousand years sold only

07:00

eight So what's the matching rule here How does it

07:03

apply How do you properly match the sails and the

07:06

expenses in the period Well you had to pay for

07:09

ten thousand housings Always cash for them and it went

07:12

out the door and recede of them came in the

07:14

door to your storage warehouse which you pay cash to

07:17

rent So there's some amount that you're paying to store

07:20

those housings that goes beyond what you paid for the

07:22

individual housing itself Inventory of storing It ain't free people

07:25

anyway Being conservative you recognize paying for these plastic housings

07:30

all upfront as an expense largely because the remaining two

07:33

thousand units are barely worth anything If you had to

07:35

go sell them quickly on eBay So one way you

07:38

can rationalize the matching here is to expense the inventory

07:41

entirely upfront As if the minute you bought it all

07:44

of it became well essentially worthless So you completely write

07:48

it off as a dead asset In this way you're

07:50

taking the most conservative route in valuing the inventory you've

07:54

just acquired You've done this believing that next quarter you'll

07:57

sell that last two thousand and your earnings will appear

08:00

more profitable than they are Actually we were because you

08:02

were overly conservative in the previous quarter Bear rational reasonable

08:07

gap compliant Well probably sure Maybe it is an insane

08:11

that you would sell no more units ever but it's

08:14

probably overly conservative here And well the more traditional way

08:18

you track these set of beans that you're counting is

08:21

to just match the eight thousand in sales with the

08:23

eight thousand informed factors you bought leaving two thousand form

08:27

factors held that book value or whatever the printer manufacturing

08:31

company paid for them in the first place Yeah that's

08:33

book value Alright set another way You note that the

08:36

form factors you've purchased are only useful or have value

08:39

If and only if you sell them composited with drones

08:43

that you're selling that is your bundling the form factor

08:46

in with the Peller guts battery powered guidance systems et

08:50

cetera of the drone If you do not sell drones

08:52

for whatever reason competition and asteroid from space wealth in

08:56

the plastic housing around them is worth well whatever it's

08:59

worth when it's melted down which is probably one hundredth

09:02

of the price you actually wait for it The key

09:04

idea here is that not everything is obvious and you

09:06

need to have a consistent rationale for the way you

09:09

manage your company's accounting in a given period You are

09:12

in a way the guardian of truth justice and the

09:14

accounting way It's almost a sacred thing to adhere to

09:18

the financial force in being truly honestly neutral when presenting

09:22

your numbers And likewise it's the duty of the auditor

09:24

of an accountant's work toe sniff carefully for lies or

09:27

leanings away from the cold neutral un emotional honest truth

09:32

and well that happens to be our favorite brand of

09:34

tea as well Run

Up Next

American Literature 3: The Poe Must Go On (Part 1)
631 Views

What do you get when the guy who wrote “The Raven” makes a serious effort to write in verse? Poe-try… Now, when you’ve detached your eyes f...

Related Videos

American Literature: Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl
8969 Views

Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, abridged. Ready? Go.

American Literature: Emily Dickinson
4357 Views

Emily Dickinson: Along with Van Gogh, proof that you’re never really famous until you’re dead.

American Literature: No Paine, No Gaine
120 Views

So the revolution was pushed along by… pamphlets? Sure, what the heck, let’s go with it.

American Literature: Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death, But I'd Prefer Liberty
348 Views

We’ll take one order of liberty, but hold the death.